JimDeMint: What the @Heritage Study Does — And Doesn’t Do @NRO http://t.co/mWhOpCloXY

I admire and applaud you for stepping down from the office of Senate, to become the President of Heritage. Outstanding. I was writing something totally different believing, and having forgotten you left office for this purpose. I apologize. You may never read or know exactly for what I'm apologizing for, but I'm saving it. I hope one day I will meet you, and I can show it to you. It was a scathing piece and then I discovered, I erred. Thank God for Wikipedia. But onto the matter at hand and your twitter post that I have used as a title.

There is a constant, unending election process that seems to be going on in Washington that causes gridlock and nothing gets done because all want to hold on to their jobs.  And in order to do that, they have to satisfy the public. There's nothing wrong with satisfying the public, that can be a good thing. But it can go horribly wrong when they try to placate the public, even when the public is wrong or mislead.

Washington's job, and the job of all politicians, especially elected officials, is supposed to be mediation between the law and the people and not be moved by their every whim if it's not wise or Constitutional. If Washington continues to be moved by the public for any reason, then America is become a Socialist nation. But if our elected officials just do what is right only, according to our values, principles, and our laws/Constitution, and then explain why what they do is right through truth and transparency, we are the Republic, with democratically held elections we are supposed to be. God Bless America.

What does that have to do with you and Heritage?  You have the ability to move the public. Heritage speaking of amnesty and its effects at this junction, and at this hour, when Immigration Reform is front and center, clouds the issue and adds fuel to the fire.  Amnesty is really not being offered, so shouldn't be the focus. You, and any organization,  are free to study what you want. But it seems peculiar to study amnesty now, and is distracting. This could cause politicians to act or not act, because of or based on the people, who could be mislead by Heritage's study. And once again nothing will get done. Though neither yourself nor Heritage have the same level of responsibility that we hold elected representatives to, I strongly believe in personal responsibility and doing what's right even when one doesn't have to and will not be specifically held accountable.  If anyone or organization can help a cause or matter in a good way, rather than harm, they should.

Immigration and the 11 million plus living here in America illegally now, must be dealt with. Status quo is an option, but a poor one, and one taken for far too long.

Mass deportation is an option too, but I don't believe a good one, and it too just a mass amnesty, is not being considered.

You may oppose each proposal, and disagree with them, but to " stir the pot" benefits no one.  Neither this administration, nor the Gang of Eight is, nor I believe will or wants to give blanket citizenship.

So, if amnesty is not on the table, there is no reason for it to be explored now.  And when it is, it looks as if Heritage is creating a false image for political purposes, and sabotage, while saying it's only a study. That may not be your motive, but that's how it appears.

Heritage gives no real counter solution, and clouds/detracts from the real issues plaguing  Immigration and so by extension what's plaguing all aspects of America, as you point out. So, anything causing us to not move forward, though cautiously and deliberately considering all aspects we must move, is detrimental. Every second in this current state costs us.

I will say it again. Amnesty is not being offered. We both know that.  So why study and make problems when there aren't any and when there's so much work to be done? Why wouldn't you study the framework set now, and from the results of the study, be constructive.  Productive. That's what American citizens need right now, not mere studies that cause unnecessary strife. Perhaps a year or two ago, your study on amnesty to avoid it made sense.  But now it looks and feels politically suspicious.  It is slightly dishonest to make it appear to the people that amnesty is on the way, even if your facts concerning it is true, and I do believe most of your results. But I also believe mostly everyone is on the same page. We just must deal with the details.

This is why you have received criticism. You could have studied the effects of the current plans, to help the legislation and problem.

Heritage should be neutral, but it just doesn't seem that way in these matters. It does not appear that Heritage is just an "educational institution".  Regardless of actual content and agreement, I have been as critical of other political/social groups.

Good day. God bless. Please don't get angry and defensive, but wholly consider what I say. Let's get the Houses and Washington productive again.

Yulanda K.

Published with Blogger-droid v2.0.10

Heritage: Our response to @marcorubio's criticism: http://t.co/TVBbfX9Mmi

My response to Heritage's response to Sen. Marco Rubio :)

I partially agree with Heritage. But then your concern and attention should be towards #WelfareReform, instead of stereotyping all Immigrants, if some, as some citizens do also, take advantage of what has been made available. Some honorably and some by fraud, but either way, it's a system defect, and not an Immigration problem.

You speak of Sen. Rubio's parents as if they only did the good things they did and the way they did them and prospered, as if they only did well because the programs of welfare and entitlement were not yet made available. As if the Rubio's would have behaved differently. You don't know that. And that suggestion is what is criticized.

With these welfare entitlements in place and available now, I have scrimped and saved, though I probably would qualify for many entitlements. It is just who I am. I'm sure others, including some of the illegal Immigrants, and possible citizens to come, will make this choice, too.  If we properly prepare and teach, testify of stories of fortitude, like that of Sen. Rubio's parents, and I dare say my own, and begin to move forward in reforming our antiquated tax codes, and some of our entitlement services and entitlement system, for both individuals AND CORPORATE, we can build up a great generation of responsible American citizens who only use the system as a safety net and trampoline. The way it was meant to be used.

You have some great arguments, some of which I agree with and I believe so does Sen. Rubio, from what I know of him. You have just applied them to the wrong debate.

Consider.

Yulanda K.

Published with Blogger-droid v2.0.10

Slight #ImmigrationReform Glitch

Slight #ImmigrationReform Glitch

I'm in full agreement with Sen. Marco Rubio and others that believe that no one already breaking the law and here illegally, should then be allowed to qualify for welfare and receive American benefits. It is one of those things that greatly effects our economy that many disregard and do not want to consider.

However, if per a Reform bill, we agree to not deport the 11 million plus here now, but create the same path to citizenship available to all from other countries, but allow them to get on track from within the country with a clear set of rules and requirements, then it would be inhumane to withhold benefits from them if they legitimately are in need and qualify.

We don't let people die in the streets for any reason. That's not America. If one were found here illegally, we should help, but it is also right to then deport them. But once they are registered and compliant, per the Immigration Reform proposal, then they would be here legally, with our permission, as residents and guests. Civility and humanity and fairness must come into play.  And the fines and back taxes they would pay, also should qualify them to partake.

The key would be the registration part of the bill. Anyone registered and waiting for citizenship, but truly qualifies for certain benefits should receive them. I believe the benefits should be limited to basic rights, though. And as with American citizens now, whether native or immigrant, it is up to state and local agencies to be diligent and prevent all fraud concerning anyone applying for and receiving welfare or assistance.

If those illegally here now fail to register, but seek benefits, then we must be ready to deny and deport. And we also must be ready to enforce laws against any person and/or agency that seeks to bypass and undermine the law in any way. They too would be essentially breaking the law.

Every aspect of this bill must be enforced, and complied with if it is going to work, or else the whole plan and all Immigration Reform will be worthless.

Consider.

Yulanda K.

Published with Blogger-droid v2.0.10

May 5th, 2013 Watched Meet The Press: Homosexuality In America

Watched Meet The Press  #MTP

#Homosexuality In America

Nice Joy-Ann Reid. Stand your ground. You're right legally, per our American government and the government/public sphere.

But what the heck was Harold Ford talking about on this subject?! Religiously, as a Christian, YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY WRONG. Homosexuality is sin. The bible is clear.

Many keep blurring the lines between government and religion; both on the Right and on the Left. Very few are graced and sent to walk on both spheres. I am one who is, but all must get an understanding.

#StraitAndNarrow is the way and few can even find it. I have found it and I walk it and I'm praying for many more to come. Billions, when compared to trillions, can be classified as a few. I challenge even God Himself daily! My logic is flawless, and my heart more so is perfect. He will not deny my request and petition.

Homosexuality is a sin. But it is not a crime. And we are to love everyone. But we love them while we hold to and speak the truth as believers and Christians, because of that same Love and using the same laws that enables Gay Activists or anyone to speak and BE boldly who they are. We speak truth in Love not just to win arguments, and especially not just to win political fights. 

Per American principles and values, which many Christians love to speak of and thump our chests about jingoistically (I too. Swag is good), there MUST BE Liberty and Justice for ALL! We can not use American Law only when it suits our cause and trample it underfoot, when it supports others. That's called hypocrisy.

What I speak is right and satisfies all sides! If it does not satisfy you, you haven't rightly considered all. Jesus did not come to tear down Rome, nor did He send Christians to tear down American justice and ways. But we are to use them, especially that blessed First Amendment to change atmospheres and save lives. That is where ALL hope lies.

Many Christians trying to be legislators and politically relevant, have failed as disciples and preachers.

#EqualityNow for Gays I say AND I am not ashamed of the gospel of #JesusChrist!

#MarriageEqualityNow for Gays! (Though, I am still considering the religious argument against the use of the word "marriage".)

But whatever America calls it, the #LBGTQ community MUST receive EVERY benefit heterosexual unions receive; Federally and Locally. The only real concern is in that most States and local governments have very different benefits for marriages and laws. Therefore, not because of any homophobic bias, but because of that, #MarriageEquality should be a State's issue. The only Federal matter should be the casting down and repeal of #DOMA. Then, case by case, if any homosexual is denied and treated unfairly and unequally in any situation, not just in the matter of marriage, the Highest Court of the Land can rectify. But, it doesn't take a new Federal law as an umbrella, only a decision and decisions on each matter. After #DOMA is repealed, and thankfully #DontAskDontTell was already, laws of Federal equality across the board are already in place. We just need compliance by States and local agencies. It is the same with religious liberties. New laws complicate things. Do it only when necessary.

Graced and Sent I truly am.

God Bless America, and EVERY American; Gay or Straight or Other! This is right spiritually, and legally. The blessing can lead one to Thē BLESSING!

Yulanda K. - An awesomely fantastic #PublicServant and Pastor right now.

PS. #JasonCollins should never be prevented or obstructed in any way in being a professional in the NBA because he's gay. But, if he gets a job just because he's gay, that's bias against every heterosexual player waiting in the wings. We are to judge ability, character and what's right for the team/winning only! Remember. Liberty and Justice for ALL!

To watch the Meet The Press segment I refer to, go to http://www.nbcnews.com/id/3032608/

The segment is called: Roundtable reviews change in social attitudes

Published with Blogger-droid v2.0.10

RealRodParsley: How would you regulate a powerful drug - maybe get doctors involved? Or, take the government's approach: http://t.co/ZESkWa3Uzs #cmc

@RealRodParsley

I'm with you sir. But your argument uses a "when does life begin" point and position, and that has been already settled via Roe v. Wade.  Whether you agree with it or not, it is the law of the land.

The better moral reasoning that is right and consistent with our laws and general values is that minors are supposed to have adult council and supervision in most matters. That's why we call them minors and even have states responsible for them if no other adult or legal guardian can be found.  The psychological/mental damage on especially young girls, not yet fully developed mentally, is a better argument for opposition against PlanB or any abortive pill being made available over-the-counter because  this argument is  consistent with other laws that governs minors. There are so many other things minors can't do at all. They can neither purchase or consume many things equally or much less harmful such as Alcohol, cigarettes, even certain movies and other forms entertainment and other medicines. And even to drive and do some other things, they can only do with adult supervision. How can this be alright when all these other things are so wrong and disallowed?

This argument can then possibly be extended as reasoning to stop Plan B being made available over-the-counter to any women the same way there is a waiting/cooling down period in some states to purchase guns, so that no one is acting in rage and does something rashly that they may regret. But stopping adult women from making the decision, even without a doctor's prescription or advice is more difficult, because adults are supposed to have liberty and be able to make independent choices.  This is America.

Save your argument that Plan B destroys life for a Roe v. Wade debate. This is not an endorsement of that, but as one concerned about Plan B being so easily accessible, I have considered what is actually right, just, and fair to all according to American fundamentals, and not either my faith or preference. Legally, your arguments about Life is not proper here, and may work against you. The same way the Left lost the Gun Reform background check fight because they over reached the constitution itself, and over extended themselves.

Peace. Fight a good fight. Fight a well reasoned, lawful disciplined fight. That means regardless of your passion, you have to be mindful that we are American and that means Liberty and Justice for all. But we use our influence to convince. Remember. Jesus never came to tear down Rome as Israel thought. He came to build the people instead. There is a difference.

Peace Pastor Parsley.

Yulanda K.

Published with Blogger-droid v2.0.10