Compromise By Way Of Time Release?

Compromise By Way Of Time Release?

Perhaps compromise can be by way of timing inorder for each public servant to keep personal and ideological integrity of those who voted for them to be their representatives and their constituents, while still moving America #forward, up, and out of this current financial mess.

Can we take a little more from the rich to pay down the debt (I can't believe I'm writing that. I as well hate #RobinHood, but hear me out:), extend the tax cuts for the middle class and poor (don't like that much either), but adopt a time table for both these tax rates to expire when the debt gets to a certain level, and then have a new system ready to kick in? Work on and hopefully implement a whole new Tax code and system; complete #Tax Reform (prayerfully with a Federal #Flattax).

Is this viable compromise?

We must also make sure this never happens again. The "rich", can not forever be made to pay more for the irresponsibility of government or any individual.

While the cuts and raises are applied. Cuts to the lower class to act as a safety net and shelter, which means funding to some of the social programs, though not all, has to decrease. The aid is still there, only it is now in the form of cuts. And raises in the form of a tax increase to those making over $250,000. But the increase must go primarily if not all to pay down the debt, or else this is all in vain.

And of course, as hinted above, before all or packaged with tax reform, we need a completely balanced budget that includes funds set aside for unexpected war or conflict, natural disasters, and the unexpected.  We must become fiscally responsible, or else we forever punish good success. Most will always be driven to reach for that American dream, but only to be punished for arriving. That's not fair. But we (notice "faith" people how I said "we" :), will suck it up for a short time, so that the next generation or the one after will not have to, if we do right now.

I'm still trying to explain my position on compromise. If on any given issue, the parties are close, then compromise is optimum. But in a completely polarized climate, it may not be.

It is possible to bring together many different sides brick by brick, layer by layer, without compromising each. This is the very definition of building. It is sturdiest when each brick is strong.

We see, our financial solution may be able to be solved using every valid view, and compromise could possibly be a matter of timing as to when to implement which ideal. One ideolgy proceeding the next, along with some over lap.

I believe most want what's best, so let us take it all in.

Considering all, always.

God Bless America.

Yulanda K.

Published with Blogger-droid v2.0.9