@CBS @CBSEveningNews @NorahODonnel @SCOTUS #Abortion #RoeVsWade Oh! SO wanted to avoid needing to respond to this shit, because it's just a draft, as reported! But alas! As quickly as possible.

Based on what? No one is saying based on what law or new evidence or LAWFUL consideration cld the Justices be overturning #RoeVWade on? Reporters aren't even citing which case the decision is of. They just keep mentioning RoeWade.

Judicial decisions and overturns must be based on something in the law. There has to be new evidence or the decision faulty for some reason of LAW! Ive heard none! In the recent cases before the Courts, the relitigating Roe isn't on the table, but only what States can do WITHIN it! Roe is settled law otherwise, and doesn't need to be codified. 

There was a heartbeat at a particular time in 1973, too, and gestation be the same, so again, what's this all about?

Congress can undo a law. The Bench cant. Theyve no legislative power. Precedences set by way of Judicial decisions based on law differs. 

Why this, now? I think they're several reasons and desired results. Let me count the ways...

To boost profiles of reps with strong personalities on both sides of the debate, as it did in 73 on, organically or inorganically, and that of Judges, Justices, law professionals and public officials, especially Governors and those running for offices, PLUS legislators and PLUS those on each side of feminism and religion, and done the mountains, is one. This all is the gift that keeps on giving for Media and content creators.

To move liberal and Left minded groups and citizens in or out of States. Dem or Liberal heavy hitters, real or fake, has been moving into Red territories trying to flip them. They may stay and do more to fight something like this. But the average liberal citizen of the masses may move out these States, because of laws like no Abortion or No Same Sex marriage, which is said to be next threatened if the Supreme Court leaves these kinds of things to the States.

I think they're trying to challenge or enforce the 10th Amendment.

I think the life time term limits and power of the Supreme Court Justices, Constitutionally, are being challenged, too. 

What they want US and the masses to believe is that Rs and Ds and Trump and Obama were working against one another with the current Bench make up. I disagree. And Biden is in on it, too. But it's not directly about putting on the Bench those more Left or Right or who wld over turn Roe vs Wade or not, I think they were putting in place ones who wld be UTTERLY RIDICULOUS and go along with this shit, KNOWING THE CONSTITUTION and that, lawfully, it CANT BE DONE or SHLDNT BE, once again to cause uncertainty, insecurity and no faith in Americas laws,principles and foundations, and then to force changes that shldnt be that wld be WORSE in leaving US vulnerable to evil doers in high places which NO CRAFTED LAW can stop from happening, so its most important that the Law and Principles just be right and that the focus and ABILITY TO DEFEND AND PROTECT THEM be secondary! 

I think these are challenging no term limits for Justices by showing the evil that can be done by one getting in for a LIFETIME or by just 5 and also challenging the number of Justices on the Bench. 

I do not think it an accident that this many new Justices were put on in a relatively short time, with pushes for retirements, and those put on relatively young and about the same age. There was a point being purposefully made or is attempting to be made.

Well, more Justices wont change anything. Look at the House vs Senate vs the Executive. Different number needed. Same bullshit. And on lifetime term, it is right to as best as possible prevent GOOD Justices from the temptation of a need to please anybody to stay in office. That can also be accomplished by a one time term that is limited, though. But do we really want a flip flop of established law every few years when there's a new term like we already see in Congress or more in the Executive Branch?

Justices can be impeached, though. May not be the appropriate term, but they can be thrown off the Bench. They cldnt murder someone and be convicted, for example, and remain. There is a way to remove them. I believe such ways shld be explored and applied to Justices who dont follow proper law and procedure like here.

There is a distinction between disagreeing with a decision and what it is based on by a Justice or Judge and their decision based on NO LAW and it be obvious! Can any judge just start opening jail cells based on personal feelings? #Godforbid. And though, as said, I suspect this is about more, overturning Roe Vs Wade wld be exactly that. It wldnt be based on any law in Our Constitution! 

Roe vs Wade didnt come about because someone or ones in federal govt just wanted to deny States Right. A suit was brought before the Supreme Court and BASED ON LAW, though the Right to Lifers dont want to hear it and don't like it, it is a violation of Individuals Right to force them to fully carry in them a dependant life. Having a heart beat doesn't mean independently viable. And even though there are two lifes with Rights, from conception or at some point, depending on what any one believes, the Right of one life trumps another. And in this case, as in others, like that of private property and trespassing and illegal residency, the owner of the space or womb takes priority over the occupier.

Some will say then this truth above shld extend to the third trimester and up until giving birth. I guess squatters Rights has gotta kick in some time. But really, to limit the time of decision to keep the baby or not, is right. And if through this time there is a change of mind, , then things like viability and medical advances and adoption has to be secondary options. There is no doubt at that point, the fetus must have more Rights than in those first days of maturation.

Its so tough. But it's right what I say. Like I say about the Justices, personal feeling have to be laid aside. 

Getting back to the Justices and what I think is being tested, it is wrong by any means for them to overturn Roe, and as wrong for States to. Whatever they may have to do to tweak the law and make it clearer for States as to what can or can not be done and is or is not Constitutional they shld do. But an overturn or huge swing in either direction there is no standing for and each of them need to be brought under Judicial review for it, IF this is all true!

Because it's about Individual Rights, this is a Federal, All 50 States and territories matter. Abortion allowed in one state but not in another wld be equal to slavery allowed in one and not another. The same with disallowance of Abortion if based on fetus rights. So, it's an all or nothing situation. Marijuana legalization isnt the same or things like it.

Now, State PROVISION for Abortion and how easy each State makes it to get Abortions or needing to provide places to get it differs as well! Those things are State decisions. An individual right needs to be protected. It does not need to be facilitated by Govt or performed by them or do they need to give anyone all needed to exercise the Right. They just need to defend the Right for that one to exercise it by their own means as it is made available by whatever lawful means. 

Per the parallel universe, I think the heart of the matter is that someone changed their mind about recieving certain ones in their camp, so to speak, and its being compared to late LATE term abortions! I think someone has changed their mind about homosexuality. I think someone has chosen to cling to one Religion! And I think many disagree with the person, personally, about all these things, or one or two of them, and other things I suppose, and dont like the unilateral decision making and are trying to show that as wrong, unto forcing changes in this other world, by chaos and ridiculousness that isnt even an exact parallel to the real world.

Finally, for Media to report this thing without also reporting on all these things I say, in the least asking on what law the Court cld over turn Roe vs Wade on, or say they have, is hella irresponsible and wrong. But I perceive its all apart of the wanted chaos.

I think I got in all I wanted to say, for now. Maybe more later.

#HonorMATTERS!

YK #Honorable #MyTime