I'm with you on every single part except the "assault" rifle ban because of the core reason behind the 2nd. I have yet to hear any adequately define the 2nd Amendment as a valid, constitutional reason to protest this ban.

The 2nd is not about recreation, or even self or property defense in its first, but only by extension. The 2nd is in place so that We The People retain the right to protect our nation as a Sovereign, Free State and ourselves against our Militia itself if necessary.

There is a reason it is the very second thought of our founders. It gave voice and put in writing the justification for America as a seperate nation from Great britain.

The Well Regulated Militia of Great Britain decided they had the right to take the freedoms and the newly established colonies by its once citizens of Great Britain. Essentially, until we won it, the Revolutionary War was a civil war where at stake was a new land that was not Britains or the Kings.

The 2nd is more of a precaution and prevention, but as long as their is a need for a military, their is a need for individuals to bear arms.

If the military has tanks, and armored planes, the very least of which should be law abiding citizens should have these weapons.

Background checks and higher standards, yes. But a ban on them, absolutely no.

Thank you,

Yulanda K.

Published with Blogger-droid v2.0.10